St. Julie Billiart Parish
7399 West 159th St.
Tinley Park, IL 60477-1398 -708 429 6767
This page updated on
05/27/09
| Human Concerns | |||
![]() Page updated:
|
Catholics and Illinois This page is dedicated to state wide issues that effect the parishioners of the parish on various issues. To keep appraised of the issues effecting Catholics and all others in this state we recommend checking with the web site of Catholic Conference of Illinois. Formed in 1969 by the Roman Catholic Bishops of Illinois, the Catholic Conference of Illinois (CCI) is the agent through which the dioceses of Illinois may act mutually and cooperatively in matters of interdiocesan and state-wide interest. CCI is a board-approved administration with legislative priorities. Important issues will appear on this page from time to time. Please take the time to get the Catholic viewpoint in these issues and then take the appropriate action. To contact your state representative or for information on legislation visit the web site of The Illinois General Assembly.
Senate Bill 1716 - Civil Unions
Points to Consider Regarding Senate Bill 1716: Civil Unions Legislation We seek to avoid
unjust discrimination; however, we oppose this civil unions legislation
because it confers legal guarantees,
equivalent in every respect, to those granted in marriage.
The proponents will say that this bill is not about same sex
marriage. Do not be misled.
This legislation is all about same sex marriage.
Ø
The legislation redefines “Spouse” to
include “a party to civil union.”
For many generations,
the term “spouse” has been defined as a married person, namely a husband or
a wife. Nevertheless, the bill
would introduce wholesale changes to this term by establishing that a
“party to a civil union’ means, and shall be included in, any definition or
use of the terms ‘spouse’, ‘family’, ‘immediate family’, ‘dependent’, ‘next
of kin’, and other terms that denote the spousal relationship, as those
terms are used throughout the law.”
It is difficult to
appreciate the far-reaching consequences of such a sweeping change.
A search on the Illinois General Assembly web site on March 1, 2009
revealed that there are more than five hundred (500) statutory provisions
that contain the term “spouse.”
This does not include the additional significant volume of regulations and
other legal provisions that would be directly altered.
Ø
The legislation provides that parties to
civil unions have equivalent legal rights as married spouses.
In case there was any doubt about the broad intended impact the bill,
please consider the bill would establish that “a party to a civil union
is entitled to the same legal obligations, responsibilities, protections,
and benefits as are afforded or recognized by the law of Illinois to
spouses, whether they derive from statute, administrative rule, policy,
common law, or any other source of civil or criminal law.”
In other words, under this bill, there is
NO difference between the two
legal relationships – marriages and civil unions.
Ø
Religious Liberty Concerns.
Beyond the important concerns identified above, there is a conflict
hidden in the bill – the emerging conflict between this legislation and
religious liberty. While the
bill states that nothing in the Act should interfere with or regulate the
religious practice of any religious body, such language may offer little
protection in the context of litigation that religious institutions could
face under the bill if adopted.
Among the questions that could emerge include:
With more than 500 statutory provisions affected by this bill, and many more
regulatory and other legal requirements, the consequences of the passage of
this bill would be far-reaching and harmful.
The Illinois legislature has previously rejected bills on same sex marriage for many good reasons, such as: (1) the natural sanctity of marriage, as the foundation of society, as a union between man and woman; (2) the “slippery slope” towards approving polygamy or other arrangements; (3) concerns about costs of government benefits; (4) the unforeseen legal and cultural impacts of such a change and much more. You should bring those same concerns to consideration of this civil unions legislation. Zach Wichmann
|
||
|
. .©
copyright 2009 |
|
||